What Are Major Corruption Challenges for Armenia and EU Partnership Countries?
The report on the state of corruption in five EU Partnership countries – published in July, 2015 – fixes several important issues observed in the five countries: Armenia, Azerbaijan, Moldova, Ukraine and Georgia.

The Media Center held a discussion on the corruption in Armenia and EU Partnership countries in 2015. The speakers included Varuzhan Hoktanyan, Executive Director at Transparency International Anti-Corruption and Marat Atovmyan, Member of the Armenian Young Lawyers Association.

“From a corruption perspective, all the five countries have three main challenges to address: limited checks and balances on the executive power, politicized and ineffective judicial system and restrictions on civil society. With respect to civil society, the main focus is on Azerbaijan because Armenia and the other countries are in a better condition,” Hoktanyan said, adding that it is the national integrity system assessment. “In Georgia, the report says, the legislative power lacks strong parliamentary control. Recently, the Georgian Government has refused to respond to the lawmakers and it is a common thing now.”

Armenia ranks 94th among 174 countries according to the Global Corruption Barometer, Marat Atovmyan said.

“The report reads that the major challenges Armenia currently has are oligarchs, underground economy, as well as patronage cases,” Atovmyan said. “82 percent of Armenians believe corruption is a serious problem in the public sector, and only 21 percent of respondents say that the Government makes great and serious efforts to fight corruption. The political and business fields are not that transparent and accountable. As for the judiciary, 70 percent believe it is not independent from the executive power.”

Atovmyan believes the tax environment in Armenia is not favorable for the development of civil society and the Anti-Corruption Council is not an effective tool to fight corruption. “It is high time Armenia had a well-established and independent anti-corruption agency. The fight against corruption includes not only the detection of corruption cases but anti-corruption education, revelation of corruption schemes and consistency.”

Lilit Arakelyan, Editor-Coordinator

Please contact the author at lilitarakelyan@pjc.am.

Print Friendly and PDF
More Press Releases
Defense Field State Procurement Contain Intense Corruption Risks: Expert
On July 26 Artak Manukyan president of National Center of Public Policy Research presented the monitoring results of 2017-2018 defense field state procurements at Media Center.
Media: New Authorities, Tendencies to be Concerned About
Manipulation, campaigns, disinformation, fake sites, all this has always been in media. It’s the scales we witness currently that enables media experts to label the situation as critical.
“The Obstacles Facing the Monitoring Group and Current Problems Relating to Violation of Human Rights in Penitentiary Institutions”
After the velvet revolution the ministry of justice sticks to the same position and keeps hindering the group's activity the same way", stated Nare Hovhannisyan, member of the public monitoring group in conducting public control in RA ministry of justice at July 25 Media Center discussion.
The Conditions of Russian Military Base Armenian Stay Should be Clarified
At July 23 Media Center discussion on “Unrest over Panik Incident”, Artur Sakunts, head of Helsinki Citizens’ Assembly Vanadzor Office labelled July 17 Panik incident on behalf of Russian military as terror act against the local population.
Why and How to Defend Scientific Thesis in Armenia
July 19, Media Center hosted a discussion on Why and How to Defend Scientific Thesis in Armenia.
Follow us on social networks
Registration of events
Armenia-Turkey Events